Archive for "GUEST CONTRIBUTORS"

ABEL RAISES CAIN and the From Here to Awesome experiment

Most readers here already know about FHTA, but for anyone who doesn’t, here is my ‘rehearsed’ 30-second elevator pitch…From Here to Awesome (FHTA) is a film discovery and distribution experiment masterminded by Lance Weiler, Arin Crumley and M dot Strange. Their mission was to create a series of participatory events related to DIY filmmaking and to connect a handful of innovative films with appreciative fans, while using the digital launch of these films as a testing ground for developing new and effective long-term distribution models. FHTA is anything but a ‘traditional’ film festival and, one year after its initial launch, the ‘experiment’ is ongoing…even as I type.

ABEL RAISES CAIN (my film, which I produced and co-directed with Jeff Hockett) was one of the final FHTA showcase films. The timing couldn’t have been more perfect, because we were looking for ways to broaden the reach of our movie, having exhausted our independent PR and outreach efforts. We’ve been actively self-distributing this documentary for a few years now. In 2006, with our first foreign TV deal, we began splitting up the rights and forming non-exclusive partnerships and I’ve continued to oversee or directly manage every aspect of the film since then.

As I’ve come to learn, it’s pretty impossible to adhere to a rigid plan when you’re self-distributing. Our strategy continually morphs as new opportunities present themselves. I like taking risks when it comes to our movie, but I also tend to be a little old school (see the ‘geriatric’ reference in my previous post). FHTA reinforced the idea of casting a wide net across multiple digital platforms simultaneously in order to reach a mass audience, and I do think this makes sense. Through FHTA, our movie was released on major outlets Indieflix, Caachi, Joost, Amazon Unbox, b-side, Netflix and Hulu.

But for any indie film to succeed these days, I feel strongly that it’s necessary to straddle both worlds, embracing the digital age while ALSO taking advantage of traditional means (before these means go entirely extinct) to get the film out and about. For example, while our documentary streams for free on Hulu, we are still screening at smaller film festivals, pursuing TV deals abroad and working on finding an educational distributor in the US.

I learned during this experiment that having a film on multiple platforms means nothing if you don’t actively promote the film. Unfortunately, I relied too heavily on each of the site’s ‘built-in’ audiences, assuming that people would just stumble upon our movie. That method doesn’t always work very well. With Caachi, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry when we found out that only one person had ordered our film. I’m hopeful that cumulative exposure over the long term may lead to more fruitful results.

One of the challenges we faced was never knowing when our film was slated to go live. It was either available or it wasn’t - wholly predetermined by the individual outlets. This precluded any ability on our part to help build a buzz around a particular platform release. I think that a revenue strategy (i.e. Download-to-Own, followed by Pay Streaming, which is then piggy-backed by Free Streaming) would have created more concrete parameters in terms of defining release windows. One issue left to be resolved is whether or not the scattershot method - casting a wide net across a variety of platforms - IS, in fact, the most efficient way to reach an audience. Maybe there is more strength in a targeted approach through one outlet in particular, especially if that outlet spotlights or showcases the film.

Netflix was an FHTA platform offered only to filmmakers who already had replicated discs. Luckily, Jeff and I were able to take advantage of this opportunity since we spent the better part of 2007 producing the DVD for our film. I think of Netflix as a 5000 pound beast (a close relative to Amazon) that you have to learn to play nice with if you want to maintain the illusion that you’re part of ‘the mainstream’ even though, as indies, you’re always going to be somewhat obscure. We had been selling the DVD exclusively through our website beginning in the Fall of 2007 and by mid-2008, our DVD was available on Amazon Marketplace. I chose to maintain total exclusivity over our film sales in the US. We stayed away from retail and rentals, because the goal was to recoup our budget by selling as many DVDs as we could.

Fast forward to the end of 2008. We had virtually exhausted our independent sales efforts. FHTA hooked us up with Indieflix and Indieflix distributed our title to Netflix. Netflix bought 180 DVDs from us through Indieflix at $10.00 a pop. Indieflix collected 30% as our intermediary agent. It was a buyout, so that means we earned $1260.00 and we won’t see any subsequent royalties. Although a fair deal on the outset, it’s slightly painful to think about the ‘what-if’ scenario…Even if just a thousand people had bought our movie instead of adding it to their Netflix queues, we could have recouped 1/6 of our budget.

It would have been cool if we negotiated a deal where we earned a royalty for each ‘turn’ (or rental) as opposed to a buyout, but hopefully at some point when our movie is offered via streaming through Netflix, we can formulate some sort of revenue split through Indieflix, that would potentially be more lucrative for us over the long term.

I don’t mean to belabor the monetary aspect, but we’re trying to figure out, like everyone else, how to sustain ourselves in the free age. Why WOULD somebody buy a DVD when they could just order it on Netflix? Or why would anyone pay to stream our movie when they can go straight to HULU or Joost and stream it for free? I, myself, wouldn’t choose to pay for something if I knew I could get it for free! But I’m a hypocrite turned realist, because I used to chase after people who posted torrents of our movie, and now I’ve given up. Maybe this is why I’ve been so protective of our DVD rights. It’s like the last remaining ‘valuable’ piece of property that we have left. It would be great if we could somehow position our film in such a way that there’s a continual stream of revenue, one that I don’t have to think about maintaining…even if it’s a small trickle, like my fantasy of selling just one DVD per day!

Now that some time has elapsed and I’ve had a chance to reflect on FHTA as a whole, it’s pretty clear that our movie was catapulted to a level that we could not have reached on our own. Hulu and Netflix have been the most successful so far, and we’re indebted to FHTA and Indieflix for getting us onto these platforms. I’m blown away by the stats…more people saw our movie on Hulu in ONE week than all of the film festival audiences combined over the course of 4-1/2 years. Now that’s just crazy! So it’s cool that new audiences keep discovering our film. FHTA turned out to be a combination of culmination and rebirth.

There is just one problem. In the grand scheme of things, we’re still an obscure movie. We’re getting a bit closer to something, although, as one friend gently reminded me, “Not every race has a finish line.” In the meantime, we have to isolate which platforms we’re going to focus on, be more proactive in pointing people to the movie, and continue reassessing as we plot which direction to head in next.

JENNY ABEL initially began a career in music, having studied the viola since the age of 8 and receiving a scholarship to attend music school. But she decided to take a completely different path in life and transferred to Emerson College in Boston, graduating with a degree in video and television production. Jenny moved to Los Angeles shortly thereafter and began coordinating overseas productions for Nu Image and Millennium Films. Over the course of four years, she helped the company produce twenty-six pictures. In 2003, she left her job so that she could focus on finishing her own project, “Abel Raises Cain,” her first feature documentary.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

When the New Breed Takes Flight (A Reflection on Sundance)

So, as every film magazine and blog is clogged with news on the awards given out at Sundance Film Festival, a familiar thought crosses my mind: should I have gone this year?

I’ve never been to Sundance. I’ve been producing/directing/shooting/editing documentary films for over 6 years. I’ve been attending indie film festivals long before indiewire.com was invented. I think you get my point– I’m passionate about independent film.

One anonymous former Sundance employee told me not to bother going. Does he have a point? Is it really all hype and a massive orgy of indie filmmakers to be avoided? I imagine there are some positive reasons for attending. I go to at least a dozen festivals a year (there are so many great ones in the San Francisco Bay Area where I live). I always walk away feeling energized.

If I’ve never been Sundance, can I call myself a filmmaker at all? This is a rhetorical question, folks. Though I do think those of us who work full-time jobs to pay our bills because our films haven’t yet recouped investment costs, have at some point or another wondered privately if we are a “legit” filmmaker.

I made a low-budget documentary film called MEDITATE AND DESTROY.  The subject of my film, Noah Levine, wrote a bestselling book called Dharma Punx that has inspired thousands of kids around the world to find positive values in their lives. The 81 minute film is about punk rock, spirituality, and inner rebellion. While I never thought Sundance was the right place to premiere MEDITATE AND DESTROY, I did think many times about attending just for the networking and obsessive film watching. But, why? Is is a waste of time and money?

Caring about most of the perceived “badges of honor” that go with what the rest of the public views as identifying a filmmaker, eludes me. I sometimes wonder– how does one qualify themselves as a filmmaker in this democratized indie age?

Some reflections:

–IMDB REJECTION: Despite appearing in half a dozen film festivals, my entry has been rejected from IMDB twice. I find this very laughable.

–NEGLECTING FILM LEAVES LOGOS- OMG! Any filmmaker worth their salt should have the film leaves on their site to show with pride the festivals they’ve been in right? MEDITATE AND DESTROY has been in six festivals and played in over 15 cities via self-distribution. Hmm. I’ve really been too busy self-distributing the film to worry about my website which currently only advertises one film leaves logo (From Here to Awesome Festival).

–CREATION OF FILM POSTER FELL BY THE WAYSIDE: As you can see from the promotion at the top of this blog, I never bothered to shell out the dough to have an official film poster created. Despite this, our NYC premiere at the From Here to Awesome Film Festival brought in a nearly sold-out audience through word-of-mouth and online promotion alone. I’ve received requests to screen the film in over 50 cities worldwide. I’m happy all the buzz was built while saving trees and utliizing web technology such as Myspace, Facebook, YouTube and our film website (www.meditateanddestroy.com).

Yes, we should care about promotion and schmoozing. But, to what extent? I think a lot of us indie filmmakers feel too reclusive, too intent on discovering our own creativity to be concerned about shaking hands, collecting business cards, and driving ourselves crazy promoting our film using every tactic from skywriting to creating condoms or beach balls with our film title on them. Especially when at the end of the day- the way films get distributed is too old fashioned, too heavily gated by corporate distribution outlets. The thing all of indie filmmakers have to get through our thick skulls is Top Tier Festivals aren’t the pie in the sky for the life of an indie film. Of course there will always be fringe festivals that provide great exposure but I honestly think we need to not stop right now being so short-sighted by thinking acceptance into a Top Tier film festivals is the only way to get your hot air balloon (i.e. your film) off the ground. In the future, I forsee an industry where a film doesn’t have to be “birthed” at Sundance of any of the Top Tier festivals. It will arise from the masses who bring it to the attention of others via a very curious and hungry public who have the tools to discover great cinema.

Because of my desire to destroy some of the myths surrounding film distribution and discovery, I’m not sure I would want to support the “machine” that is Sundance even as a mere attendee. I do feel openminded towards the idea of going once in my lifetime. However, the work I’m drawn to is much more experimental and I’d rather spend my money and vacation time on a beach in Mexico. Most of my favorite independent films never played at Sundance. Although the festival claims to showcase groundbreaking work- in the past 15 years I’ve never had a problem discovering mindblowing, original work elsewhere. The purpose of this blog isn’t to critique the little festival in Park City– just simply to reflect on why it has such a cultural resonance as the “place to go for independent film”. Most importantly, I think the culture at large is confused about what independent film actually is. While I am happy to see Sundance launch The New Frontier program for experimental work, there are many other festivals that celebrate experiemental on-the-whole– not as a fringe program.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this media frenzy surrounding Sundance and I’ve concluded if I do attend one day it will be one reason– just to observe what exactly will be left in the dust when the New Breed takes flight.

I think 2009 is a time to start shifting our eyesight and resources towards the creation of this new type of Independent Film Flight (IFF). Instead of a spotlight, let’s start thinking about our films taking off into a IFF that consists of democratized public discovery. To truly imagine a way for an industry to help sustain filmmakers and not continue to feel honorable having thousands of young filmmakers buy into the myth that a Top Tier film festival World Premiere is the only way for their debt to die and for their reputation to rise from the ashes. It’s just so silly to rely on 5-10 festivals for launching the career of an independent filmmaker. Many talented people never dream of applying to an Ivy League school- but does that mean they have nothing original or of redeeming value to offer the world?

Yes, this is a radical idea. This is the New Breed. This will be awesome.

SARAH FISHER has worked at MTV News, the U.S. Information Agency, C-SPAN, CBSNews.com, and A&E Television Networks Interactive. She worked on the 2005 Dreamworks film, JUST LIKE HEAVEN, starring Mark Ruffalo and Reese Witherspoon in San Francisco. She made several short films before Directing/Producing her first feature documentary, MEDITATE AND DESTROY. She has embraced the medium of film to bring much needed awareness of ’sacred cinema’ to audiences. Her love of film began at age 12 when she received the Fisher Price PXL2000 toy camera as a gift. She taught filmmaking to high school students at the 2005 San Francisco Summer Arts Conservatory.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Introducing Abel Raises Cain

This post will begin with a brief disclaimer: I have made only one film. I had no idea what I was doing when I started working on this film. I’m not even sure if I’ll ever make another film because I’ve been working on the same film for ten years. If there is a New Breed geriatric ward, perhaps I should be wheeled over there immediately. So why am I here?

Well, I found out that doing things the hard way can sometimes lead to fruitful results. It also helps if you have a partner in crime, even if he/she is equally new to the filmmaking process. If you’re a patient and persistent person without any money, working on a project that you care deeply about, and continual rejections do not phase you, then you might be curious to read more about the story behind ABEL RAISES CAIN.

First of all, I’m an only child born to two eccentric parents. I was raised in Westport, CT, an affluent town about an hour north of New York City. The Abels living in Westport was like ‘Sanford and Son’ meets ‘Dynasty.’ Let’s just say, we always stuck out like sore thumbs. But even though we were outsiders, I felt pretty lucky to have two funny and interesting role models as parents.

I started a career in music when I was very young and by the time I got to college, I was burnt by all the rehearsing and performing. So I eventually dropped music altogether, switched majors and transferred to Emerson College in Boston, where I studied TV and Video Production. My ‘real’ education started when I moved to LA and got a job working in the film industry at a company that made killer octopus, shoot-’em-up and Jean-Claude Van Damme movies. After 5 years of shipping weird and sometimes dangerous props to Bulgaria and bending over backwards for ’stars’ like Steven Segal, I grew tired of working on other people’s films. Time was ticking and I wanted to focus on my own creative project. So I left my job and went to work full time on my film.

ABEL RAISES CAIN is a documentary about growing up with my lovable yet slightly demented father, Alan Abel, who is known for his elaborate and outrageous media stunts - such as Euthanasia Cruises, Omar’s School for Beggars, The Society for Indecency to Naked Animals, promoting a KKK Symphony Orchestra, marrying Idi Amin to a WASP, etc. While humorous on the surface, his pranks poke fun at larger social and political issues while playing on the media’s gullibility and weakness for sensational stories.

Since this was our first film, Jeff and I learned by doing. (Jeff, by the way, is my co-director and boyfriend, who my dad set me up with on a blind date 7 years ago.) We immersed ourselves in the project and tried not to become overwhelmed by the amount of archival material that we had to sift through. There were hundreds of hours of radio shows, TV appearances, old films, and thousands of newspaper clippings, letters and photographs. It was pretty crazy for two people to handle this looming mass by themselves. We’re talking six decades or more worth of stuff. My parent’s storage unit was busting at the seams, there was so much memorabilia. Plus we had shot over a hundred hours of modern day footage with my parents over the course of several years.

After wading through the seemingly endless archive, we began breaking the story down into essential topics. Jeff was integral to the whittling-down process since he has a background in news editing. Because I was so close to the subject matter, his input was invaluable at this stage - he provided the objectivity that I lacked. I logged, organized and did a preliminary assessment of the materials, then Jeff made his selects. We could not have completed post-production on the film without managing our time wisely, chipping away at different tasks simultaneously, and balancing creativity with organization. It really helped that our team had one anal retentive person and one creative mind. You’ll have to guess which one is which.

We had a pretty good idea that the tone of the piece should mimic my father’s unpredictable nature. We began building a storyline around a dozen of my father’s pranks that we would use as a means to guide the story along. Jeff and I did not want to create a dry, conventional, biographical documentary told in a chronological fashion. It wouldn’t do justice to the subject matter! Instead, our goal was to create an interesting, quirky portrait of an obscure underground prankster whom nobody had ever really heard of before. And rather than a boring documentary full of analysis, it would be a personal story told from my point of view, with gently planted subtext about the media and other sub-themes woven throughout. It took us close to a year just to write the script. But we didn’t grow impatient because we knew how crucial it would be to create a compelling story.

Although we were aiming to complete the fine cut in time to submit to Sundance and Slamdance, we tried not to feel rushed. I definitely do not advocate rushing a delivery - it will inevitably lead to mistakes, no matter how much of a perfectionist you are. But at the same time, I do believe in setting time frames, or else the project will drag on forever and never get completed. Sounds a little ridiculous coming from someone who has worked on the same movie for 10 years, I know.

So where are we now with ABEL RAISES CAIN and where are we going? Well, ever since our premiere at Slamdance ‘05, we have been promoting, marketing and self-distributing the movie. Self-distribution is kind of a misnomer because we’re not doing EVERYthing ourselves. We’re employing a hybrid strategy inspired by Peter Broderick, a DIY-friendly distribution consultant. We split up the rights in such a way that we control 100% of our US DVD sales while Films We Like, Ron Mann’s company based out of Toronto, handles our distribution throughout Canada (non-theatrical, TV and DVD).

When we first started out, Jeff and I were able to close a few major foreign deals on our own, but we realized there was only so much we could do by ourselves. Now we’re working with a foreign sales agent (Ewa Bigio of Smiley Film Sales) who is continuing to pitch our documentary to additional territories as well as develop a narrative based on my dad’s life story. Without a doubt, participating in the From Here to Awesome showcase this past year led to some pretty cool opportunities. Indieflix and Heretic Films are now delivering our movie across a variety of digital platforms in the US, including Amazon Unbox, Caachi and Netflix. These outlets have really opened up a whole new audience for us and we’re pretty excited about it.

In retrospect, I am glad that we didn’t sign an all-encompassing deal with one entity back when we were touring the film fest circuit. We wouldn’t have had the freedom that we’ve enjoyed these past few years, doing whatever we please with the film. The downside is that we’ve remained somewhat obscure and it’s been difficult reaching a wider audience. Right now I’m working on connecting the movie with my dad’s underground fan base and exploring different ways to get the word out about the film. Some ideas I have are merging the film’s site with my father’s website, and helping my dad set up a video blog where he can rant freely.

Now that we’re nearing the end of this crazy journey, if I could go back in time and do it all over again, I would definitely do one thing differently…I would keep a better record of our fans, begin building a mailing list early on, getting people to sign up at screenings, and maintaining it religiously throughout the entire project. Staying in touch with everyone and sending out pertinent and timely updates, (making sure NOT to pester, only inform) is something I will treat as a priority on our next film.

I joke that I could easily spend the rest of my life promoting ABEL RAISES CAIN, but the truth is, we are winding down now and Jeff and I are on creative hiatus while we work production jobs to pay the bills that have piled up since we began working on the movie together in 2003.

Even though we won’t be actively engaging in a collective new work just yet, we’ll certainly continue brainstorming ideas for our next film…a project that may or may not feature my ‘crazy’ parents.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

A Little Mouth to Feed - Slamdance Day One

Ok. So here’s the day 1 experience of the “A Little Mouth to Feed” cast and crew experience at Slamdance.

So far this is the little fest that could. Meaning it operates within minimal resources and succeeds in creating a great experience for the filmmakers.

This is basically a look at a first day at the fest without a lot of commentary.

Will share what I’m learning about marketing within the fest / longterm soon.

Will also get the taped session of our 1st talkback up. But enjoy the podcast for now.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Emerging Filmmaker with Slamdance Short Ponders DIY Marketing, Distro, Guitar Chords in the Woods and Butt Acting

NEW BREED presents guest contributer and filmmaker, Jack Daniel Stanley. Called an internet “pioneer” of “original, independent content”, director/writer Jack accompanies his short film “A Little Mouth To Feed” to Slamdance 09.

On the topic of DIY distribution, Cassavetes-esque horror iconoclast and one of my role models / filmmaking heroes, Larry Fessenden (The Habit, Wendigo, The Last Winter) had the following to say in a 2007 IndiePix taped interview: “It was a three or four year commitment.  I’d spend every night making the ads, which is hardly the way a filmmaker should spend their time”, only to quickly follow up with “I was happy to do it, because I enjoy all the elements of film and promotion, but not every body’s up for that.”

“All the elements of film …” so … making ads, postcards, posters, press kits, trailers … that’s all part of FILMmaking?  The notion reminds me of something a drummer I knew used to say while lugging his bands’ gear in for the night’s gig.  Waddle-walking with a giant speaker, he’d smile in passing and quip “Hey man I checked ‘drummer’, not ‘roadie’ on the job application.”  This would get chuckles of commiseration from the rest of the band.  While loading gear sucks and had zero to do with the reasons the band started hanging out and jamming, they willingly undertook it as necessary in order to get their art out there, to be part of that two part process of communication with an audience – encoding and decoding.  To strain a cliché - if a guitar chord is struck in a garage and there’s no one there to hear it, does it make a sound?

 By that token filmmaking would include marketing.  If a film is made on a laptop, and no one is there to see it, is it really a film?  Or just an incredibly expensive screen saver?  So OK, yeah.  I gotta do the marketing thing.  Why make the movie if I’m not gonna try to give it some kind of life outside of my computer screen?  Well there are a few reasons: learning, practice, and the fact that filmmaking is a worthwhile endeavor in and of itself, come immediately to mind.  But a movie is not an exercise, it’s a form of expression, and there is no expression unless there’s a someone receiving the art at the other end of the tin can and string.

So I buy that marketing and distro are part of my responsibility as the artist / filmmaker.  But what about the liking it part.  Am I, like Fessenden, “happy to do it”, or do I fall into the latter category of folks that aren’t “up for it”?  We’ll I’m doing my best at it.  But as for liking it, the jury’s still out.  It’s too soon to tell and I’ve just got too many other things on the burner.  And that brings us to …

Who the hell am I, why I have I been honored with the opportunity to contribute here at New Breed Filmmakers, and why should you care what I have to say?  Well I can answer the first three, as for the last question – why you should listen, no particular reason other than the fact that I can offer a case study of a particular filmmaker seeking to have his voice heard at the beginning of that journey with notes from the frontline along the way.

Basically I’m a guy who’s been sharing my dark-fiction shorts (yeah, OK “Horror”) online ever since I began filmmaking about three years ago when the accessibility of the technology both in terms of ease of use and cost finally met at a point where I really didn’t have an excuse to not make films anymore.  Since then I’ve been incubating artistically and hiding online from the real world while somehow building somewhat of an audience and reputation in the virtual one.  My website has had 1.5 million hits since October of 2005, and I’ve written and directed 8 short films, co-wrote 1, and wrote and starred in two others.  And oh yeah, speaking of acting, my butt had a scene with Denzel Washington in Déjà Vu.  I only had one line in the scene, but my butt shared several minutes with Denzel, though it received no billing (a source of bitter contention between the two of us).  Anyway, if you’ve seen Déjà Vu, I’m the  “You wanna mask?” guy in the upside down ambulance wreckage scene (don’t blink).  My butt is the white roundish blurry thing directly to the right of Denzel’s head for the majority of the scene.  Denzel allowed my butt to call him “D” but he never made eye contact or spoke with me.  Anyway – where was I?  Oh yeah.  Internet, filmmaking, 1.5 million hits, 11 films in 36 months. 

I also received a write-up on internet star / horror writer Scott Sigler’s AMCtv blog “Horror Hacker” which called me a “pioneer” of “original independent content [online]”.  Which was doubly cool, because he got turned on to me by another internet filmmaker whom I’d never met,  Earl Newton creator of the online scifi/horror series “Stranger Things”.  Sigler was actually interviewing this him and he’d seen my work online and liked it and was gracious enough to share some of his spotlight by mentioning me as someone Sigler should look at for the focus of his article – free internet content that’s worth watching.

Like the Sigler article, any of the other virtual world success I’ve had hasn’t really been from aggressive marketing, with one possible caveat.  For the most part I’ve just been making the films and putting them out there in cyberspace and that’s been enough to get some folks’ attention and attract producers Barry Green and David Jimerson of Wrightsville Beach Studios, who’ve completely paid for my last three short films – yes they have a plan to make their money back, will get to that in a future entry hopefully.  I’m also developing a feature with these guys.  More on that later as well. 

So what online marketing have I done pre Slamdance; what’s the caveat I mentioned?  Well I’ve participated actively on a large filmmaking / tech forum, DVXuser.com.  Though this was not primarily marketing motivated , it’s had the same effect.  Basically the website, which I now moderate, hosts three genre-themed (mostly) filmmaking contests a year, and I’ve entered almost all of them, winning or placing each time.  So in that insular community I began to have a reputation that’s brought with it lots of positive developments and wee bit of backlash.  The DVXfests are unique in that they encourage transparency and marketing and discussion of the fest films before they are even made.  This dialogue has grown and become even more transparent in partially due to New Breed Curator / Filmmaker Zak Forsman’s input and influence there.

Get the whole story »

  • Share/Save/Bookmark